No doubt, the Last Supper was done with Photoshop – one can see the haloes emanating from the edges of those from the Roman Fobbed List of the wealthy of yesteryear who’s bought themselves a place in that Happy Hour picture.

The ‘Paris Picture’ by Magritte, Matisse, … or was it Monty Python or even Lat is something else surely…? I don’t think that rather laid back dull-looking character (the one with the commie tie) would be somebody who would buy himself a place in a picture – even if the public purse is forced on him. It would be unfair, a notional travesty for jungleland Malaysia, if the public is made to feel that when da man has not bought himself a place in that Photoshop creation that he has.

It is further unfair to make it appear that da man is da man and he was actually in Paris (or a ‘French’ restaurant somewhere) and even ordered a Mongolian dish with the Cock or Vin. Even the relatives of the man with the red no Mongolian tie say that he has never bought himself a place in the picture. We have to dutifully believe them.

The moral of the story is – in spite of all that philosophy of or behind those works of art no one should be shopped unless the fake is a genuine Photoshop. Which of course it isn’t.

Given that in this modern day the net allows one to reach the whole world at the retouch of a button, one should be more careful to give a better impression of our country by making a better fake of a picture.

We have a successful string of politicians straight out of edited-out bad Monty Python sketches we cannot afford to have the same kind of artists – those who almost made real genuine Photoshops into fakes.

Before you get stuck onto those pieces of wood and martyred in the name of St Adobe, can we request some more genuine Photoshops of Lost Suppers – dinners at some high altartuya, Three Men in a Mongolian steamboat…, please?

The trouble with our Adobe-forsaken country is that at a drop of a hat(e), quite a few people can dress up as scary clowns and wave daggers screaming threats of violent deaths and racist pogroms. Our media toadies are like ph*cking deceased lambs in a Mongolian stew when it comes to exposing that festering rot in our politics and society. But when it comes to a genuine Adobe-blessed piece of art work, all hell breaks loose and our nation’s whore-house of reporters with loose morals all fall over backward or bend over forward to get themselves stuffed from the rear by politicians with no morals to make a case out of nothing.
Talk about genuine prostitutes!

We’ve got a serious problem here with people who can’t laugh. And they tend to be those with their behinds plugged who reach out for the daggers every time they are supposed to show civilisation and religiosity… What a pitiful shame!

Lighten up, you bastards! – Enjoy! You warped sods are going to watch someone cruxified for rather harmless Photoshop and maybe even someone else let off for not leaving any of his Mongolian hot pet behind on dinner table!

I will vote in the coming general election in 2009 for the Barisan Nasional. I will not vote for Parti Keadilan Rakyat because it is a party made up of immoral people, who comprise of homosexuals, liars, slanderers, and murderers, who are all very very corrupt.

This is how I will vote :

1. Barisan Nasional vs. Parti Islam Se Malaysia [ I vote for BN ]
2. Barisan Nasional vs. Parti Keadilan Rakyat [ I vote for BN ]
3. Democratic Action Party vs Barisan Nasional [ I vote for DAP ]

I will say NO to PAS and Keadilan.

Its leader Anwar Ibrahim is a corrupt man who enjoys anal sex with Tian Chua! Yes, Tian you are gay like Anwar!

p/s: Tun Dr Mahathir is the winner of the court case between him and Anwar Ibrahim. The Judge found Dr Mahathir did nothing wrong in calling Anwar a homosexual especially since Anwar has regular anal sex with you, Tian Chua. Both of you also drink beer and can drunk.

As far as BN or UMNO is concerned, my demand for their resignation will be seen through my vote during the coming election. Trust me, I will bring my balls and will use my head (the one between my shoulders) to vote wisely and it wont be for BN.

“‘On ne voit bien qu’avec le cÅ“ur, l’essentiel est invisible pour les yeux’ (It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye). “

By providing his “reasons, intentions and motives for posting that picture” is not sufficient for the following reasons:-

(i) the means (doctored image) does not and should not justify the ends (his reasons, intentions and motives);

(ii) He preaches about fair play, transparency, integrity and other noble values. By posting a doctored image, it goes against what he preaches and seemed to me contracdictory to his principles;

(iii) he didn’t even bother to provide his reasons, intentions and motives when he posted the doctored image. He only provide them after being crticized. Hence, his reasons, intentions and motives may be an afterthought.

His refusal to apologise comes across as arrogant and insenstive especially to the deceased and her family. It does not accord well with what he preaches at all.

I think if you has the decency to apologise, it may save his integrity and reputation, whatever is left!