If this clown was asked or if he invited himself to do the spiel those in the audience should have given him his sens worth of educating him and guiding him along the straight and narrow. He was more than ‘rude’ he was insulting the intelligence of Malaysians while making a shameless dickhead of himself with his cartload of belachan-laced bollocks.

I can give the half-assed fool one credit though - he revealed he was a ’socialist’ before, one with a pillow bank. But then he somehow slipped off the great road - or maybe someone slipped him 20 sens to turn in his hide(?)… If he was eloquent he would have used words like sell-out, turncoat and definitely traitor to describe those with his kind of problem with describing truth.

That the Misinformed Minister should be unhappy about Bung Karno or Malays who aren’t grateful for the crumbs from under the table of graft and corruption is rather strange: Sukarno (and everybody else) was not altogether wrong about Malaysia (or her anthem). Seen by progressives (and non-revisionists) throughout history, Malaysia was a creation of colonial interest and backed by a bunch of local turncoats (traitors in other word) who sold out the Malays (and every other Malayan). I believe the minister for untruths calls people like that ‘lackey(s) of colonial power’. His term ‘instruments for foreign interest’ would also be appropriate to describe such unworthy two-faced double-dealing political polecats. Where do these hideous types stand among those patriots who fought the ‘White Massahs’ and who made tough sacrifice?

Denis Healey, the then Labour Party cabinet minister and Bilderberg stooge who was instrumental at helping incorporate the now component parts of Malaysia into British neo-colonial plan was very kind in his biography about those sell-outs of southeast Asia. It is very touching comment for the tail-ends (arsehole) of colonial power from a socialist sell-out from the Labour Party.

I emailed you an article by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim (Malaysia.pdf). Unfortunately, I do not have the source of this article. The title of this article is A Malaysian Economic Agenda. Perhaps Zam is referring to Anwar on this article.